What policies should we adopt to ensure a fair justice system?
All frontline Police officers will be equipped with personal cameras.
@PaulJRobinson - over 10 years ago
Tricky. Agree for armed response officers. But all officers? Have a feeling this could be abused and be a huge invasion of privacy. If a 'Bobby on the beat' mistreats you, you can go to IPCC (although strong argument for reforming IPCC, that's a different issue). If an armed officer mistreats you, it could lead to death. Much greater case for monitoring actions of Armed Officers only. On 9 Jan 2014 13:38, "philipjohn" [email protected] wrote:
You can merge this Pull Request by running
git pull https://github.com/philipjohn/manifesto police-personal-cams
Or view, comment on, or merge it at:
https://github.com/openpolitics/manifesto/pull/50 Commit Summary - Police personal cameras
File Changes - M crime.mdhttps://github.com/openpolitics/manifesto/pull/50/files#diff-0(4)
Patch Links: - https://github.com/openpolitics/manifesto/pull/50.patch - https://github.com/openpolitics/manifesto/pull/50.diff
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/openpolitics/manifesto/pull/50 .
@philipjohn - over 10 years ago
To my mind it serves two purposes; 1. Protects officers from accusations of brutally (as many people scream out when being arrested or 'moved on') 2. Protects the public from mistreatment as officers know if they make a wrong move, it'll be caught
I think those benefits are valuable in all situations, not just high-risk ones. It's already been done in Staffordshire: http://lichfieldlive.co.uk/2013/10/14/police-officers-in-lichfield-and-burntwood-to-be-issued-with-body-cameras/
@PaulJRobinson - over 10 years ago
Ok. If it's already been trialled it would be good to extend this.
with kind regards, Paul Robinson
about.me/pauljrobinson
On 9 January 2014 14:44, philipjohn [email protected] wrote:
To my mind it serves two purposes; 1. Protects officers from accusations of brutally (as many people scream out when being arrested or 'moved on') 2. Protects the public from mistreatment as officers know if they make a wrong move, it'll be caught
I think those benefits are valuable in all situations, not just high-risk ones. It's already been done in Staffordshire:
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/openpolitics/manifesto/pull/50#issuecomment-31937320 .
@frankieroberto - over 10 years ago
Isn't this an operational matter for individual police forces? Not sure it should be a national policy.
@philipjohn - over 10 years ago
Just saw this on twitter: @jearle @JackofKent 88% decline in complaints when the police had cameras attached, 60% decline in violence by police: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/04/07/business/wearable-video-cameras-for-police-officers.html?_r=0
👍 on that basis. @philipjohn, can you include a link to that evidence in the policy itself before we merge?
What policies should we adopt to ensure a fair justice system?
All frontline Police officers will be equipped with personal cameras for the potential reduction in complaints and violence (1)
@philipjohn - over 10 years ago